Initiative for the Immediate Phase-out of Nuclear
Energy
Dear Mr. ______________________,
I wish to protest against the release of large amounts
of radioactively contaminated materials from nuclear plants being
dismantled into the environment and residential areas. The EU guideline
limits exposure to 10 microsievert/year per person. With the release
level set by you the effective cumulative exposure dose for individuals
will already be reached with single nuclides, exceeding the intended
10 microsievert by a factor of 6,500.
- You decided in the new Radiation Safety Law that tritium
(H-3) can be released without limit as long as its specific activity
remains just below one million Becquerel per litre (or four million
per gallon). I protest against that and demand that the current H-3
content in ground water of 0.5 Becquerel per litre shall not be exceeded.
- I demand an immediate stop to the disposal of radioactive
residues on regular waste deposits and to the recycling of weakly radioactive
scrap metal. Weakly radioactive substances must be stored in special
containers.
- I demand the increase to 1 millisievert for the permissible
drainage of radioactive materials from nuclear plants into air and water
be lowered to the old limit of 0.3 millisievert.
- I object to the current and planned interim storage deposits
near nuclear power plants due to the increase they cause in gamma and
neutron radiation and the danger of possible terrorist attacks.
- I demand the stop of the Castor transports because these
transports constantly release radioactivity into the surroundings.
- In addition, I demand the stop of reprocessing nuclear waste
because nuclear waste reprocessing plants continuously release radioactivity.
- The German Umweltministerium für Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit
(Environmental Ministry for the Protection of Nature and Reactor
Safety) informed us in Dr. Geigl´s letter, dated 6.16.2000, that scientific
literature now cites numerous findings regarding the mutation of normal
cells into malignant cells caused by low intensity radiation. As early
as 1972, the Canadian scientist Petkau established that chronic low
intensity radiation causes damage to the cell membrane. Intact cell membranes
are indispensable for a good immune system. Prof. Dr. John Gofmann who
participated in the development of the atomic bomb, said: “Now that we
know the dangers of weak radiation the crime we committed was no longer
an experiment we made, but murder.” (abbreviated quote)
- According to the statistic of disease types compiled by
the AOK West (General Local Health Insurance, West Germany) in 1995
cases of hospitalisation due to tumours have increased 65% between
1980 and 1995 and those due to dietary illnesses, metabolic diseases
and disturbances of the immune system increased by about a third.
- The right to life and to be free from bodily harm, article
2 of the German constitution, is being violated. I reserve the right
to hold you responsible for any bodily and material damage caused to me
by this violation. In your own interest and in the interest of all human
beings I demand that you support the immediate intensified usage of renewable
energy sources, their specific promotion and the immediate shut-down of
all nuclear power plants. The fuel rods accumulating until then must be
stored in the storage basins inside the plants.
Yours sincerely
Bundeskanzler
Gerhard Schröder
Kanzleramt
D-10557 Berlin
|
RWE-AG
Dr. Dietmar Kuhnt
Vorstandsvorsitzender
Opernplatz 1
D-45128 Essen
|
EON-AG
Ulrich Hartmann
Vorstandsvorsitzender
Bennigsen Platz 1
D-40444 Düsseldorf
|
Jürgen Trittin
Umweltminister
Alexanderplatz 6
D-10178 Berlin
|
Energie Baden-Württemberg AG
ENBW
Gerhard Goll
Vorstandsvorsitzender
Durlacher-Allee 93
D-76011 Karlsruhe
|
Vattenfall Europe AG
Vorsitzender
Chausseestraße 23
D-10115 Berlin
|
Wolfgang Klement
Wirtschafts-Arbeits- und Sozialminister, Bundesministerium
für Wirtschaft undTechnologie
Scharnhorststr. 34-37
D-10115 Berlin
|
Wolfram König
Präsident des Bundesamtes für Strahlenschutz
Postfach 100149
D-38201 Salzgitter
|
Initiative for the Immediate Phase-out of Nuclear Energy
(currently comprised of more than 100 associations and
over 2000 individual members)
Final storage and
disposal of nuclear waste – high risk and tremendous cost
(as PDF
file to be downloaded and distributed)
The safety of the experimental nuclear end storage depot
at Asse, Germany, is being endangered by the penetration of 11 cubic
meters of brine (saline solution) each day. Partial filling costs
the tax payer 125 million Euros.
1 The nuclear end
storage depot Morsleben, Germany, is being endangered by chunks of
salt weighing a ton each, threatening to fall onto the barrels containing
the atomic waste. Filling the storage chambers with salt is very expensive.
In the pilot reprocessing plant in Gorleben, Germany, fuel elements are
intended to be regrouped and liquid wastes vaporised. This plant runs
up to 400 million Euros in costs.
2
Cheap release and “disposal” of nuclear waste for nuclear
power operators as agreed with the current government.
- high risk for the health of the population
- release of large amounts of radioactively contaminated
materials from nuclear plants being dismantled with still high radioactive
concentrations into the environment and residential areas. The
European Union´s guideline sets a limit of 10 microsievert /year
per person. The above mentioned release leads to an accumulated exposure
dose in individuals which is 6 00 times higher than the intended 10
microsievert 3 (e.g. after the purchase of a radioactive
chair, coffee cups, silverware – the exposure accumulates!)
- tritium containing water may be released without
limits as long as its specific activity remains below 1 million Becquerel
per litre (about 4 million Becquerel per gallon), even to baby food
production. For comparison: ground water has a tritium content of 0.5
Bq/l ! 4
- elimination of radioactive remnants on garbage dumps
as well as recycling of weakly radioactive scrap metal (allowed under
certain conditions since the end of the seventies) 5
is possible today in large amounts 6, e.g. as dental
braces or beverage cans. 7
- increase of the introduction of radioactive substances
from nuclear facilities into air or water from 0.3 millisievert to
1 millisievert 8.
- construction of interim storage facilities (cement
halls) for the storage of fuel rods near atomic power plants causes
an increase in the gamma and neutron radiation in the surrounding
areas and poses a serious danger due to possible terrorist attacks.
The Federal Ministry for the Environment Nature Conservation
and Nuclear Safety (Umweltministerium für Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit)
has told our initiative in a letter from Dr. Greipl that scientific
literature meanwhile cites numerous cases of mutations of normal cells
to malignant ones caused by low intensity radioactivity. As early as
1972 the Canadian scientist Petkau noted damage to cell membranes due
to chronic exposure to weak radiation. Intact cell membranes are indispensable
for a healthy immune system. Prof. Dr. John Gofmann who participated
in the development of the atomic bomb, said: “
Now that we know the
dangers of weak radiation the crime we committed was no longer an experiment
we made, but murder.”
9 (abbreviated quote)
According to the statistic of disease types compiled by
the AOK West (German health insurance company) in 1997 cases of
hospitalisation due to tumours have increased by about 50% between
1985 and 1997 and those due to dietary illnesses, metabolic diseases
and disorders of the immune system increased by about a third.
The right to life and to be free from bodily harm
is being violated.
(Article 2 of the German basic law)
Please help yourself and us by switching to ecologic energy
providers and by printing and mailing the information given by the
following internet addresses.
1. Schaumburger Nachrichten, 27.02.2001;
2.
Newspaper Widerstand Nr. 1 1/2001 p.3;
3. Messerschmidt,
H., Strahlentelex mit Elektrosmogreport Nr.344-345/2001, p.3;
4.
Dr. Pflugbeil, S. (Präsident der Gesellschaft für Strahlenschutz
e. V.) Strahlentelex mit Elektrosmogreport Nr. 348/349, 2001, p.7
;
5. Neumann W. „Freigabe von schwachradioaktiven
Reststoffen“, report 21-22, p.86 Otto Hug Strahleninstitut Berlin,
April 2000;
6. Ebda, p.86, Otto Hug Strahleninstitut Berlin,
April 2000;
7. Öko-Test 7/2000;
8. Dersee, T., Berlin
Strahlentelex mit Elektrosmogreport Nr. 342/343, 2001, p.2;
9.
Graueb, R., „Der Petkau-Effekt“ Bern 1990, introduction and p.113